Escaping Rape Accused Shot

After the few days of arrest, the four accused for the rape and murder of a young doctor are shot nearly about 6.15 AM today morning. The Hyderabad police Commissioner RV Sajjanar said that the four accused are taken to the place of incident for the collection of evidence related to this heinous crime and it's recreation. But in meanwhile one of the accused tried to snatch  pistol of Sub - Inspector and tried to run away others started throwing stones on police team , in the rivalry about 35 minutes all the four accused were shot.

It was the action of police in self defence.This encounter lead appraisal of Hyderabad Police. Journalists, politicians, people and public  have appreciated the action of the policemen.

The escape led them to get killed by the bullets of Police. Earlier they brutally raped and burnt a 27 years old veterinary doctor in Cyberabad police area. Many of the local men said that this encounter is true justice for the crime done by the devil's.

Triple Talaq Abolishment Act, 2019

The Bill makes declaration of talaq a cognizable offence, attracting up to three years’ imprisonment with a fine. The offence will be cognizable only if information relating to the offence is given by: (i) the married woman (against whom talaq has been declared), or (ii) any person related to her by blood or marriage. 

The Bill provides that the Magistrate may grant bail to the accused. The bail may be granted only after hearing the woman (against whom talaq has been pronounced), and if  .. the Magistrate is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for granting bail. 

The Triple Talaq bill could not make it through the Upper House earlier this year during the first term of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government, although it was passed by Lok Sabha.

After hours of deliberation, the Rajya Sabha today passed the triple talaq- Muslim 19929 (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019. The bill makes instant triple talaq a criminal offence and provides for a jail term to a Muslim man for the crime. It was cleared by the House with 99 votes in favour and 84 opposing it. 

Kashmir Issue : A Tug of War between Indo-Pak

Kashmir, and adjacent areas like Gilgit, Jammu, and Ladakh – were part of the different empires at different times. Over the years, this area was under the control of Hindu rulers, Muslim emperors, Sikhs, Afghans, and Britishers.

During the period before AD 1000, Kashmir was an important center of Buddhism and Hinduism. Many dynasties like Gonanditya, Karkota, Lohara ruled Kashmir and surrounding areas of North-western India.The Hindu dynasty rule which extended until 1339 was replaced by the Muslim rule by Shah Mir who became the first Muslim ruler of Kashmir, inaugurating the Shah Mir dynasty. A few centuries later, the last independent ruler Yusuf Shah Chak was deposed by the Mughal emperor Akbar the Great.

Akbar conquered Kashmir in 1587, making it part of the Mughal Empire. Subsequently, the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb expanded the empire further. During the time of partition of British India (1947), Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) was a Princely State. Britishers had given all princely states choice – either to join India or to join Pakistan or even to remain independent.

The ruler of Kashmir during that time (1947) was Maharaja Hari Singh, the great-grandson of Maharaja Gulab Singh. He was a Hindu who ruled over a majority-Muslim princely state.

He did not want to merge with India or Pakistan.Hari Singh tried to negotiate with India and Pakistan to have an independent status for his state. He offered a proposal of Standstill Agreement to both the Dominion, pending a final decision on State’s accession. On August 12, 1947, the Prime Minister of Jammu and Kashmir sent identical communications to the Government of India and Pakistan.Pakistan accepted the offer and sent a communication to J&K Prime Minister on August 15, 1947. It read, “The Government of Pakistan agrees to have Standstill Agreement with Jammu and Kashmir for the continuation of existing arrangements …”

India advised the Maharaja to send his authorized representative to Delhi for further discussion on the offer.

Conclusion

The Kashmir issue – which was once a simple one, has now turned a complex problem to solve. It has multiple dimensions – external and internal; inter-state as well as intra-state. Not even the separatists are on the same ground – their demands are different.

The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir which was under the control of British India – is now not entirely with India. Pakistan and China too  now occupy a significant portion of the terrorities of the erstwhile princely state.

Of course, the Kashmir problem also includes the issue of Kashmiri identity known as Kashmiriyat. However, almost every state in India has its own identity – Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, West Bengal or Kerala. However, the people in each of these states even when seeing themselves as Tamilians, Kannadagans, Bengalis or Malayalis are also able to see the bigger picture – they identify themselves as Indians.The first step to solve the Kashmir issue is to identify the problems behind the alienation of Kashmir. Here are some of them:

• Mishandling of the Kashmir Issue by the successive Central governments of India – which includes frequent dismissal of State Assemblies.
• The state governments of Kashmir failed to distribute the benefits of growth and development to every area of the Kashmir.
• The terrorist and military outfits in Pakistan has been distancing the youth of Kashmir from the democratic form of the Indian government.
• The regular presence of the Indian Armed Force or CAPF in the Kashmir interiors, and the misuse of provisions like ASFPA.
To find a solution to Kashmir issue – all stakeholders should be considered.
Kashmir was and still is an integral part of India. It has a plural and secular culture – just like the rest of India. Urgent steps should be taken to bridge the gaps of trust deficit in the minds of Kashmiri youth. All Kashmiris should get the due share in the growth story of India. Like all other states in India, there should be adequate political autonomy in Jammu and Kashmir.

Copyright and TM - Explained

Copyright and trademark Works in designing and patenting

You create a unique design and want to protect your rights in it.  But how?  Should you apply for a copyright, a trademark or a design patent?   The answer ~ it depends.  

We often find confusion surrounding designs.  We may get a request to file a design patent, but a copyright application is more appropriate.  Or we may get a request to file a trademark, but the design as used is not an indicator of source.  So what are the differences between a copyright, trademark and design patent?

A copyright protects original works of authorship.  This includes literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, for example, photographs, paintings, clothing designs, poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software, and architecture. A copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation.   
Copyright exists from the moment the work is created and is in a tangible form.  Thus, copyright registration is voluntary.  If you wish to bring a lawsuit for infringement of a U.S. work, however, you will have to register the work. There are significant advantages that may apply if you register your copyright within three months of publication, such as the ability to seek statutory damages and attorney fees.  

A trademark, on the other hand, is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods of one party from those of others.  Trademark rights are obtained when the mark is used in U.S. commerce.  The rights can be based in common-law, or due to registration with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, which provides for stronger enforcement of trademark rights.
So how do you differentiate your work? 

I painted a butterfly, naming the work “Find Joy Everywhere.”  I intend to create copies of the painting and sell them in a store. Have I gained rights in copyright or trademark? In this example, I have only created rights in copyright.  All that I have done is to create a piece of art.  I am not using the painting as a symbol of my business.  I am simply selling the art through my business.

Copyright is the legal authority to use and sell a piece of work in a given time. It protects the interest of the sellers or first producer, say inventor.